Conservatives planned to reimburse Senator Mike Duffy: court documents | Toronto Star
The Toronto Star will be always the same... hopefully not.
Why not start by placing facts and presenting some clean honest journalism. Yes, there is corruption and yes, it needs to be cleaned and soon and it might cost Stephen Harper his job and all that. But instead of instigating against the party in power, which will backfire because it will not be forgotten that the Liberal party too, and much worst, was involved in corruption and the obvious difference is that the Toronto Star did not spend a second trying to show how corrupt their protegees were.
There is clear difference between elitist collectivist, the kind of the Liberal party of Canada or the NDP, as well as the PQ and the Green with all the socialist, communist, etc, to follow; and the conservatives, notice please the small 'c' at the front, because Harper's government is more like
Progressive which means, is from the system down, not from the individual up. The clear difference is precisely that. The so called left, is a monolithic body full of corruption because humans are weak and therefore potentially to be corrupted while the other side too, has humans and thereby are also weak and potentially to be corrupted. On both cases it is power what corrupts. But there is another difference and it is that the so called left tends to go for popularity while the other side tends to go for principle. That explains why in the 'flavour' of democracy we are all lied into, which says the majorities command, when the economy appears to be rolling, it it is the left side who wins them, only to destroy it and then the cycle restarts.
If the left is after popularity, it is in need to present only angels in their side, and I am talking about the good ones, even if most of them happens to be of the kind Jesus warned us about, those wolves dressed on sheepskin.
So, corruption in the left? Never!
Corruption on the right? Always! so says the left to the people, like the Toronto Star here or there, here with the Mike Duffy affair or with Rob Ford or with whoever happens to be in turn.
Hence, there is a lesson for the right side. If you get into power, after those cycles when then left has destroyed the lives and futures of so many; do not get stuck on trying to be as popular as the leftist want to be, but dismantle the government apparatus they build, which is for sure just about in every case a nest of corruption and focus on small government, less taxes and strictly govern on protecting life and freedom.
Many will wonder on what happen to the so called centre, which is what people answers to be when anyone asks the question. There is no centre! Wake up!
The centre is a machination of the left to put a foot in the door and to invade your soul with ideals that are not for the benefit but of the elites in command. Collectivism is the prime source of individualism which is the worst kind of selfishness. Is there any wonder why the left is so entrenched on trying to institutionalize abortion and euthanasia, sodomy and to destroy the family?
The Toronto Star will be always the same... hopefully not.
Why not start by placing facts and presenting some clean honest journalism. Yes, there is corruption and yes, it needs to be cleaned and soon and it might cost Stephen Harper his job and all that. But instead of instigating against the party in power, which will backfire because it will not be forgotten that the Liberal party too, and much worst, was involved in corruption and the obvious difference is that the Toronto Star did not spend a second trying to show how corrupt their protegees were.
There is clear difference between elitist collectivist, the kind of the Liberal party of Canada or the NDP, as well as the PQ and the Green with all the socialist, communist, etc, to follow; and the conservatives, notice please the small 'c' at the front, because Harper's government is more like
Progressive which means, is from the system down, not from the individual up. The clear difference is precisely that. The so called left, is a monolithic body full of corruption because humans are weak and therefore potentially to be corrupted while the other side too, has humans and thereby are also weak and potentially to be corrupted. On both cases it is power what corrupts. But there is another difference and it is that the so called left tends to go for popularity while the other side tends to go for principle. That explains why in the 'flavour' of democracy we are all lied into, which says the majorities command, when the economy appears to be rolling, it it is the left side who wins them, only to destroy it and then the cycle restarts.
If the left is after popularity, it is in need to present only angels in their side, and I am talking about the good ones, even if most of them happens to be of the kind Jesus warned us about, those wolves dressed on sheepskin.
So, corruption in the left? Never!
Corruption on the right? Always! so says the left to the people, like the Toronto Star here or there, here with the Mike Duffy affair or with Rob Ford or with whoever happens to be in turn.
Hence, there is a lesson for the right side. If you get into power, after those cycles when then left has destroyed the lives and futures of so many; do not get stuck on trying to be as popular as the leftist want to be, but dismantle the government apparatus they build, which is for sure just about in every case a nest of corruption and focus on small government, less taxes and strictly govern on protecting life and freedom.
Many will wonder on what happen to the so called centre, which is what people answers to be when anyone asks the question. There is no centre! Wake up!
The centre is a machination of the left to put a foot in the door and to invade your soul with ideals that are not for the benefit but of the elites in command. Collectivism is the prime source of individualism which is the worst kind of selfishness. Is there any wonder why the left is so entrenched on trying to institutionalize abortion and euthanasia, sodomy and to destroy the family?
Comments