Skip to main content

Bill C-389 - An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code (gender identity and gender expression)

From: Cesar Fernandez-Stoll [CesarFStoll@gmail.com]
Sent: November 11, 2010 10:47 AM
To: 'pm@pm.gc.ca'
Cc: ALL MP
Subject: Bill C-389 - An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code (gender identity and gender expression)

Dear Mr. Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada:

I’d like to bring to your attention Bill C-389 now on the 3rd Session, 40th Parliament. A note states the following:

This bill was introduced during the Second Session of the 40th Parliament. Pursuant to the Standing Orders of the House of Commons, it is deemed to have been considered and approved at all stages completed at the time of prorogation of the Second Session. The number of the bill remains unchanged.”


SUMMARY
This enactment amends the Canadian Human Rights Act to include gender identity and gender expression as prohibited grounds of discrimination.
This enactment also amends the Criminal Code to include gender identity and gender expression as distinguishing characteristics protected under section 318 and as aggravating factors to be taken into consideration under section 718.2 at the time of sentencing.

The first obvious point is why? It seems that Canada does not have enough issues to work out on Parliament that gender confusion needs to be added and ‘massaged’, until is granted of course. I say confusion because it is what this entire bill aims for.

Ever since the previous Liberal party government passed few years back that absurdity, recognizing the sodomite life style as a ‘human Right’ to be equated to the legitimate human rights; our basic and fundamental freedoms, not given by government or by the law of humans, but by God. Ever since that calamitous moment, we’ve witnessed how the so called Human Rights Commissions have gone out of their way to assault the basic freedoms of religion, opinion, association, expression, among others, causing considerable damage, because the ‘new’ found ‘human right’ has been taken not as another one, but as one over and above every other, which is what defines its illegitimacy, but which fact keeps being ignored by our ‘glorious’ Parliament.

Now we are faced with this not so new initiative, which of course, will make everything that define the line between genders, to disappear to the wishes of every depraved and degenerated soul out there which will impose his/her ‘right’ to be more ‘equal than everyone else’ and so, if there was some sort of right to privacy, it will depend on how these corrupted minds decide and their coffers and that of the so called Human Rights Commissions will continue to fat themselves with the cases that ignore human dignity and give free ride to human degradation.

I don’t think there is an answer on how to regulate anything that can be claimed against a human right, which again, can identify the legitimacy of true freedom before other attempts which our Parliament seems to find as appealing as long as votes can be found.

If our government, or politicians, want votes, freedom needs to be guaranteed, not regulated. No it is not freedom what is allowed when a transvestite wants to get into a girls bathroom claiming to be equal, it is protection to the freedom of the girls in there that want or need their privacy that is being declared void. This is only a token of the extent of the damage we can see coming as a consequence of a government and Parliament being so weak, that cannot even lead into the proper direction our country needs to take.

We need to go back to basics and to establish as a fact what defines the duty of government that of protecting life and freedom, not legislating them but their protection. Life from conception to natural death, freedom so that people can live free of eventual degenerated trying to obstruct it. Freedom by the way comes with responsibility and accountability and here is where the law of God prevails, because it is Him who gives us the freedom we must be accountable to Him for using or abusing.  

I really hope that all the members of parliament copied here, take action towards protecting our right of life and freedom and not to confuse the law by creating these type of nonsense like bill C-389.

César Fernández-Stoll
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his disciples

Gospel text ( L uke 11,1-4): One day Jesus was praying in a certain place and when He had finished, one of his disciples said to him, «Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his disciples». And Jesus said to them, «When you pray, say this: Father, hallowed be your name, may your kingdom come, give us each day the kind of bread we need, and forgive us our sins, for we also for-give all who do us wrong, and do not bring us to the test»

What is going wrong with the world?!

After the question which seems to come back at every generation, the clearest answer is perhaps… ‘Selfishness’ The point is very simple, when we put our own ego, our self, at the center of everything… Do we expect the rest of the world to bend backwards to satisfy us? We do have fundamental freedoms like opinion, religion, etc. Are those freedoms to be limited by the freedom of others? Are those freedoms to limit the freedom of others?

Money

Is money the ultimate goal, the end of all means? Nowadays, it seems, everything is not just measured in terms of money, but everything needs to be, has to be, in terms of money. Money is set as the goal, over anything. Money is meant to be just a media for exchange of goods and services, not a goal on itself, yet our society has corrupted onto making of money a statement beyond life, family, marriage and most definitively above love and truth. Such a philosophy has degraded our souls to the point of denying everything that is in conflict with the value of money. Even when charity is concerned, it seems mercy can only be measured in monetary terms, as if charity could be measured by anyone except God alone. If there is crusade or cause to be enrolled, the only acceptable way has been institutionalized as the amount of money it can be contributed, regardless of the individual efforts that could be applied or spent.