Skip to main content

Vatican spokesman condemns loss of life in flotilla clash

The loss of life is always regretful and I don't think there will be a moment when the Vatican will actually celebrate the loss of life.
The events that keep unfolding in the Middle East for centuries and which has most definitively have been in the eye of the news, since the days in which the state of Israel was created; cannot be seen simply from the spectator side and judged without directly seeking peace and justice.

Much is being said about the way Israel defends its position, which as far as several Arab leaders, included the Palestinians is concerned, is more than anything, surviving.
Throughout my early years I have witnessed and been very critical about the way, after the end of World War II, and perhaps as a consequence of the terrible events and revelations from the death camps and concentration camps; Jews have been characterized as victims and as usually happens, some have taken advantage of the condition to abuse it.
However, after sixty years, the whole Arab world and even adding Iran to it, does not seem to have any other objective in life but to destroy Israel, not accepting any condition that will allow peace.
Why is it that, if Israelis are going to be asked restraint and to put the other chic, the same attitude is not applied to the whole Arab world?
Israel's response might be usually violent, but so it is that of the Palestine.
Pope Benedict XVI has a very interesting and good approach to all of this and it is to put the truth forward so that love can flourish, because Jesus has set us free by the truth.
But while Hamas and other groups at war against Israel continue to be at war, I see very difficult to expect the state of Israel to simply cease to exist because these people want to win while their own people live in stagnation, not because of Israel, but because of their own leadership focusing on the wrong priorities.
Peace is not the absence of war, but the triumph of the truth and by simply condemning one side while offering the other as a helpless victim, peace is not served, because the truth is not provided as the foundation of that goal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his disciples

Gospel text ( L uke 11,1-4): One day Jesus was praying in a certain place and when He had finished, one of his disciples said to him, «Lord, teach us to pray, just as John taught his disciples». And Jesus said to them, «When you pray, say this: Father, hallowed be your name, may your kingdom come, give us each day the kind of bread we need, and forgive us our sins, for we also for-give all who do us wrong, and do not bring us to the test»

Money

Is money the ultimate goal, the end of all means? Nowadays, it seems, everything is not just measured in terms of money, but everything needs to be, has to be, in terms of money. Money is set as the goal, over anything. Money is meant to be just a media for exchange of goods and services, not a goal on itself, yet our society has corrupted onto making of money a statement beyond life, family, marriage and most definitively above love and truth. Such a philosophy has degraded our souls to the point of denying everything that is in conflict with the value of money. Even when charity is concerned, it seems mercy can only be measured in monetary terms, as if charity could be measured by anyone except God alone. If there is crusade or cause to be enrolled, the only acceptable way has been institutionalized as the amount of money it can be contributed, regardless of the individual efforts that could be applied or spent.

What is going wrong with the world?!

After the question which seems to come back at every generation, the clearest answer is perhaps… ‘Selfishness’ The point is very simple, when we put our own ego, our self, at the center of everything… Do we expect the rest of the world to bend backwards to satisfy us? We do have fundamental freedoms like opinion, religion, etc. Are those freedoms to be limited by the freedom of others? Are those freedoms to limit the freedom of others?